Say What?
From the Japan Times:
U.S. owes A-bomb apology
Read the article; it is an interesting insight into the Japanese Government's reasoning behind its own nuclear non-proliferation stance (even though it conveniently turns a blind eye to allowing nuclear-armed US warships to use its ports). Here's the money quote:
"To end the vicious cycle of nuclear proliferation, the U.S., the first to use nuclear bombs as a weapon of war, should apologize to Japan for the bombings and pledge to abandon all nuclear arms."
Got that? The editorial writer's opinion is that the United States of America apologize to the Japanese for dropping the first uranium and plutonium devices on their cities, as a way to start the ball rolling on a worldwide disarmament strategy.
First, a bit of historical context: Wars that start with a undeclared, or 'sneak' attack will usually not end well, and usually require both combatants to sink into real depths of competitive barbarism. We were attacked by the Japanese, and spent a boatload of money in developing these bombs. Smoe thought that it would have been wasted money and effort if we hadn't used them, while others pointed to the projected casualty figures for Operations Coronet and Olympic.
Second, as to apologies:
Has Japan apologized for invading Korea and China?
Has Japan apologized for the Rape of Nanjing?
Has Japan apologized for its experiments in chemical and biological warfare on Chinese civilians?
Has Japan apologized for its use of Chinese and Korean "comfort women?"
We did not attack Japan at Pearl Harbor. We didn't start the war - but we finished it.
It is up to the vanquished to apologize first. It's just good manners.
U.S. owes A-bomb apology
Read the article; it is an interesting insight into the Japanese Government's reasoning behind its own nuclear non-proliferation stance (even though it conveniently turns a blind eye to allowing nuclear-armed US warships to use its ports). Here's the money quote:
"To end the vicious cycle of nuclear proliferation, the U.S., the first to use nuclear bombs as a weapon of war, should apologize to Japan for the bombings and pledge to abandon all nuclear arms."
Got that? The editorial writer's opinion is that the United States of America apologize to the Japanese for dropping the first uranium and plutonium devices on their cities, as a way to start the ball rolling on a worldwide disarmament strategy.
First, a bit of historical context: Wars that start with a undeclared, or 'sneak' attack will usually not end well, and usually require both combatants to sink into real depths of competitive barbarism. We were attacked by the Japanese, and spent a boatload of money in developing these bombs. Smoe thought that it would have been wasted money and effort if we hadn't used them, while others pointed to the projected casualty figures for Operations Coronet and Olympic.
Second, as to apologies:
Has Japan apologized for invading Korea and China?
Has Japan apologized for the Rape of Nanjing?
Has Japan apologized for its experiments in chemical and biological warfare on Chinese civilians?
Has Japan apologized for its use of Chinese and Korean "comfort women?"
We did not attack Japan at Pearl Harbor. We didn't start the war - but we finished it.
It is up to the vanquished to apologize first. It's just good manners.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home